Strategic Planning

Trends in Local Infrastructure Investment in California

Since the 1970s, state-level investment in infrastructure for roads, water supply, K-12 and higher education facilities and other public facilities has stagnated. California is literally living off its earlier investments in water resources, higher education, and transportation. These "keystone" investments were made during the Earl Warren and Pat Brown eras when per capita state-government capital outlay spending exceeded $150 (in 1996 dollars). Since the late 1970s, real, state capital outlay spending has fallen to $30 per capita; and local spending has plummeted at the same time. The net result is that California has not adequately invested in expanding and maintaining its infrastructure. Inadequate investment in public infrastructure means that congestion and declining service quality is pervasive and driving up business and household costs. Perhaps more importantly, California's access to fundamental infrastructure services – higher education, health and social services and mobility is declining, especially for low-income ethnic minorities. Lack of investment in infrastructure maintenance is accelerating physical deterioration of key public assets and reducing the quantity and quality of services. unless the state reverses these trends, California's economic future is threatened. The big question:  Are the same trends taking place at the local government level?

Principal Investigator:
David Dowall

Contact Information:
Tel:  510.642.6579
Fax:  510.643.9576
Email:  dowall@berkeley.edu

Funding Information:
U.C. Berkeley - Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics

Start Date: 7/1/05

California at 50,000,000: A Colloquium on the State's Demographic, Economic & Environmental Future

There has been little systematic analysis to estimate the scale of needed investments and to identify options for more effectively delivering and managing critical state and local services, infrastructure, and development. How much and what kind of investment is needed over the next 20 to 25 years? How will changing ethnic, demographic and geographic patterns affect demand for critical infrastructure services? How can state and local planners, policymakers and managers utilize strategic planning, demand management, pricing, and enhanced project delivery tools to maximize social returns on their investments? How should we preserve and protect our natural resources? Answer to these questions are critical for the design of policies and programs that will effectively promote the prosperity and quality of life of current and future Californians.

Principal Investigator:
David Dowall

Contact Information:
Tel: 510.642.6579
Fax:  510.643.9576
Email:  dowall@berkeley.edu

Funding Information:
UC Berkeley – School of Public Health

Start Date: 5/12/04

Syndicate content